This case helps to clarify the rare cases in which findings of fact should be separated from assessing if the threshold for significant harm is established and how the courts understand the term “non-accidental injury”.
You need to log in to Community Care Inform to view this content. If you have a subscription, please log in here.
Please contact the Community Care Inform helpdesk or phone 020 3915 9444 if you require support or assistance or are unsure if you have a subscription.
If you don’t currently have access, click here to find out more about subscribing to Community Care Inform.