Radicalisation: London Borough of Tower Hamlets v B 
Publication Date: 19 October 2015
Photo: Gary Brigden
By Michael Jones, barrister, Deans Court Chambers, Manchester. This case is an example of how the significant harm test is being applied in cases of ‘radicalisation’; a 16-year-old girl was deemed to be at serious risk of emotional harm while living with her parents. This judgment has received a significant amount of media attention as […]
You need to log in to Community Care Inform to view this content. If you have a subscription, please log in here.
Please contact the Community Care Inform helpdesk or phone 020 3915 9444 if you require support or assistance or are unsure if you have a subscription.
If you are directly quoting the author's own words from this document you must acknowledge that they are not your own words by putting them within quotes marks, reference the source in the text and then provide the full reference at the end of the document. For example:
In the text:
Brackenbridge argues that "[t]he interpersonal dynamics of sexual abuse in sport are similar to those in other settings but exacerbated by some key situational differences" (Brackenbridge, 2008).
Full reference to insert at the bottom of the document:
Brackenbridge, C. (2008) Child Protection in Sport. Guide.
Community Care Inform Children [online].
Available at: https://www.ccinform.co.uk/articles/2008/02/22/1973/Child+protection+in+sport.html [accessed: INSERT DATE HERE (eg 25 November 2015)]