The online resource for professionals
working with children and families
SUBSCRIBER LOGIN:

*R (on the application of O) v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough

Case date: 28 July 2011



Introduction
The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, in dismissing the claimant's appeal, held that he had no valid grounds of appeal, nor had he established a claim for judicial review, in challenging the defendant local authority's choice of accommodation for the claimant child.

Details of the case

The claimant was 13 years old. He suffered from, amongst other things, severe autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The claimant's conditions made his behaviour very hard for his family to manage and his parents recognised that they were no longer able to meet his needs at home. The defendant local authority accepted that the claimant's parents were prevented from providing him with suitable accommodation or care, with the result that it had a duty to provide him with accommodation pursuant to section 20 of the Children Act 1989 (the 1989 Act).

The parents wanted the claimant to be placed in a residential school which they had identified as being a suitable establishment (the residential school). The authority carried out a core assessment which set out three options for consideration, none of which were the residential school.

To read the rest of this article you must log in
Existing users login here

Find out how Community Care Inform can help you, and sign up to a free trial:
Instant access to unique, expert-written practice information
Trusted, accurate and regularly updated information to support you in your practice. Click here to find out more
Professionalism
Evidence your practice and expand your knowledge base
What do our subscribers say about us?
Click here to hear video testimonials

For more information on Inform email us, or telephone 020 8652 4848



© 2013 Reed Business Information Limited. All Rights Reserved.